Readability describes how easily an intended audience can understand written information. At page level, it includes the order of ideas, the vocabulary, the navigation and the explanation of unfamiliar concepts. Short sentences alone cannot fix a confusing argument.
Start with the intended reader
Name the person and task before judging the text. A procurement manager may need precise contractual terms that would overwhelm a first-time customer. Define specialist language when necessary and retain distinctions that affect the decision. W3C’s accessible-writing guidance provides practical ways to make web content understandable. Those usability recommendations should not be presented as proof that Google applies a particular reading-age score.
Test the structure before polishing sentences
Read only the title and headings. They should describe a sensible path from the question to the answer. Move prerequisites before instructions and separate decisions from background explanation. Put the main answer where readers can find it without deciphering a promotional introduction. A clear main heading and meaningful section labels help establish that structure. Check the same order on mobile, where a sidebar may appear in a different position.
Use scores as prompts, not instructions
Automated tools can flag dense passages, but they may penalise necessary product names or misread lists. Test comprehension by asking someone in the intended audience to explain the next step in their own words. Inspect link labels, form instructions and error messages as well as prose. SEO content review can connect search intent with those practical reading tasks.
Observe comprehension without prompting
Give a representative reader a realistic question and let them use the page without guidance. Note where they pause, misinterpret a term or look in the wrong section. Ask them to explain the answer in their own words afterwards. Avoid leading questions such as whether the new version is clearer. Specific observations provide a better editing brief than a broad positive reaction or a numerical readability grade alone.
An appointment page example
Suppose a Perth assessment provider describes its service using internal acronyms throughout. A clearer version could explain who the assessment suits, what to bring, how long to allow and what follows. Necessary technical names can remain beside plain explanations. The improvement should be tested with realistic readers, including those using assistive technology. Better accessibility and comprehension are worthwhile outcomes, but a readability score change alone cannot demonstrate a ranking benefit.
Common questions
Does Google require a specific reading age?
No published universal reading-age target applies to web pages. Write for the knowledge and needs of the intended audience.
Should technical terms always be removed?
No. Keep terms that provide necessary precision, explain them clearly and avoid jargon that adds no useful distinction.
Terms in this guide
- Accessibility — Designing content and controls so people with different abilities can use them, including through a keyboard, screen reader, enlarged text or reduced motion.
- H1 heading — The primary page heading that introduces the content’s main subject. This site uses one clear H1 and a logical hierarchy of supporting headings.
- Search intent — The task or question behind a search, such as learning a concept, comparing options or finding a provider. Content should answer the intended need.
Related SEO guides
Apply this to your website
Explore SEO Services for help planning and implementing the relevant changes, or discuss your website with Refined IT.